Ancient Aliens: Evidence of Stephen Hawking’s Claim that “Philosophy is Dead”

Ancient Aliens: Evidence of Stephen Hawking’s Claim that “Philosophy is Dead”

Note: This article was cited in the New York Times (July 22, 2018) as an intellectual counter to the emerging religion of “Ancient Aliens.”

The Grand Design (2012), Stephen Hawking and Leonard Mlodinow claimed that “philosophy is dead” (p in the book. 5). They wrote: “We exist but also for a few days, as well as in that time explore but a small part of the universe that is whole. But humans are a curious species. We wonder, we seek answers. Located in this world that is vast is by turns kind and cruel, and gazing during the immense heavens above, folks have always asked a variety of questions: how do we comprehend the world in which we find ourselves? How can the universe behave? What’s the nature of reality? Where d > philosophy is dead. Philosophy have not kept up with modern developments in science, particularly physics.” (p. 5).

Needless to say, philosophy continues to be alive in academic journals, Amazon books, in addition to philosophy that is shrinking at the Barnes & Noble bookstores. But, as a force in popular culture, contemporary philosophy is essentially dead, primarily as it has failed to keep up using the discoveries in contemporary cosmology. When you look at the wake for the stunning achievements associated with Apollo program plus the Hubble Space Telescope (just two examples), philosophy has failed essaywriters247.com company to generate a popular cosmic narrative that integrates the origins and destinies regarding the human species to the vast and wondrous cosmos—an expanding universe stretching across 100 billion light years and populated with 2 trillion galaxies and untold variety of stars, planets, lifeforms, and black holes. This death began aided by the crash of Apollo 8 and Earthrise.

This cosmic and philosophical failure is ev >2001: an area Odyssey (1968) and Interstellar (2014), Hollywood populates the expanding universe with endless monsters (ex: the Alien series) and apocalyptic warfare (ex: Star Wars), complimented by almost no awe, wonder, and discovery. The recent Star Trek films are not that different from Star Wars. Here our company is fifty years after Apollo and thirty years after the Hubble telescope, plus the dominant ideologies will always be situated in cosmic narcissism and super-specialness—pretending that is human end up being the center associated with universe or underneath the delusion that a Creator or Ancient Aliens are looking out for us.

Into the lack of a meaningful space philosophy, the hit television series Ancient Aliens (2010-) has hijacked the cosmic narratives from Apollo and 2001 and claims to describe humanity’s origins and destiny when you look at the universe. In Ancient Aliens, we are able to see philosophy’s corpse that is mediated where an attempted space philosophy and cosmic narrative have crashed and are usually still aflame in America from the History Channel.

Two Val >The ancient-astronaut theory draws upon two val > may have developed space travel technologies that enable them to traverse the distances that are great relative ease. at the very least this is the “wormhole” scenario depicted in touch (1997) and Interstellar (2014) . That sa we have been visited, precisely because the distances are so vast, the universe is so gigantic, and our planet is so tiny > it is highly unlikely.

Yet, such a possibility (however slim) is certainly one reasons why 2001 offers such a vision that is compelling of origins and destinies. Most likely, it might be an moment that is epochal find a black monolith somewhere on Earth or the moon, beaming out a radio signal to an alert and curious species. Such a possibility is very appealing to me, at the least in theory. As the astronaut Taylor says in Planet regarding the Apes, “Out there, there has to be something a lot better than man. Has got to be.” Needless to say, if ancient astronauts have visited Earth, they would have possessed technologies that are extremely advanced been seen as gods, angels, and miracle makers by premodern humans. Just like the apes in 2001, the humans could have looked at the technologies with amazement and fear. But have any astronauts that are ancient visited Earth?

Where’s the monolith that is black?

Where’s the same as the black monolith in 2001 — that single artifact of indisputable extraterrestrial design or origin? Where is the evidence that is verifiable ancient astronauts or extraterrestrials visited our planet to enlighten our species, perform great deeds, and guide our art, technology, and architecture? It’s possible some might be way more advanced and enlightened than our species, I am open to actual empirical evidence since I think extraterrestrial life forms surely exist and. Unfortunately, all the ancient-astronaut theorists can point toward is a few mysterious artifacts, none of which may be attached to visitations that are extraterrestrial.

Where will be the “Chariots regarding the Gods”?

During my youth, I watched reruns or VHS tapes of 2001 and Planet for the Apes times that are many along with a number of other science-fiction films. I also recall viewing reruns of Chariots of this Gods and Mysteries of the Gods, which aired from the television station that is local. The shows are currently available on YouTube, and my viewings that are recent the majority of my original memories of these. Both films clearly attempted to connect astronauts that are ancient Apollo and space exploration, aided by the Voyager space probe and starship Enterprise appearing early in Mysteries associated with the Gods. Viewing the films that are above my youth inspired me to read Chariots of the Gods?, readily available at the time in local bookstores. I viewed the films and see the book with rapt attention, precisely because von Daniken appeared to be providing “evidence” for a person narrative that has been element of a larger celestial narrative outside the theism that prevailed in Texas, where I happened to be born and spent my youth (in a largely secular household). Initially, this thesis was quite attractive and appeared to reflect an alternative model for human origins and possible destinies. It appeared like a attack that is plausible the cultural and historical orthodoxy regarding the age, especially the pre-Copernican ideologies regarding the proselytizing evangelicals within my suburb.

Upon later reflection, however, I found myself questioning the logic associated with the book’s assertions and came to comprehend that von Daniken’s “ancient-astronaut” thesis was deeply mistaken. The book’s flaws were exposed in a 1976 Skeptical Inquirer article along with a book entitled The Space Gods Revealed that featured a forward by none except that Carl Sagan.1 By 1977, Chariot for the Gods? was debunked in a BBC-PBS creation of Nova in an episode called “The Case of the Ancient Astronauts.”2 The episode refuted the following claims: a picture of an ancient astronaut was carved on a Mayan sarcophagus, the Nazca Lines in Peru were originally an ancient-astronaut spaceport, ancient astronauts inspired various carvings on Peruvian stones, and ancient astronauts built the pyramids in Egypt and also the Moai statues on Easter Island.

The above mentioned assertions are among the most ludicrous and illogical interpretations of human artifacts produced by the ancient-astronaut theorists, and all sorts of are wholly unproven. In a variety of ways, the series is an attack on logic, rationality, therefore the nature of ev >Ancient Aliens has been on television for seven seasons suggests you will find sizable audiences who are quite gullible, unable to think logically, and scientifically illiterate. Plus, you will find irresponsible and intellectually bankrupt television programmers, but that is nothing new either.

Within the wake associated with Trump pres >Chariots for the Gods? and Ancient Aliens, practically all associated with ev that is so-called be solved.

Practically all the claims of extraterrestrial influence made on Ancient Aliens assume that human civilization and consciousness don’t have a lot of creativity, originality, or ability to innovate. The idea that is general that, without assistance from the ancient astronauts, humans will be helpless and may never build such great structures or make profound scientific discoveries. Plus, the show assumes there’s no available room for chance, surprise, emergence, singularities, or any of the insights of chaos and complexity theory. The series represents an assault on rationality and scientific methods, not unlike all other paranormal movies and television shows in the end.

By | 2019-09-06T22:52:16-04:00 September 6th, 2019|Blog|